I suppose by now most
people that know me well know of my love-hate (actually I wouldn't
say love) relationship with most of the late Mani Kaul's
films. The man had some chops – his themes were not conventional,
he had an eye for lighting and shot composition, and he could use
music in a very evocative way. But he was a twat, too full of his own
artistic importance and what an antithesis he was going to be to
traditional narrative-oriented Indian cinema – one of the joys of
reading Satyajit Ray's essay collection Our Films, Their
Films was his contemptuous dismissal of Kaul's film-making
style as “anemic”.
Most of the Mani Kaul
films I saw were on the Doordarshan channel (yes, yes, in
those old days when TV wasn't all Sari
and Sins). Luckily enough the first one I caught was Nazar,
which I remember being fairly intrigued by (especially Piyush
Shah's images set to classical music) even though it wasn't
breezy viewing. I will be revisiting it soon to see how my interest
holds up. Later on, I slogged through Uski Roti (not
even sure now if I saw it in full, because I was plain zombified by
the experience) and Duvidha
(more on this ahead). I was also “privileged” to
see Beyond The Cloud Door, his "masterful" contribution
to the shorts compilation Erotic
Tales, at Mumbai's New Excelsior cinema. Despite Anu
Agarwal's Tittu
Ahluwalia act, most of the crowd gathered there was swearing
at the dullness and incomprehensibility of the proceedings and I
could not blame them. Sadly, I haven't seen any of his documentaries,
I suspect the form is a lot more suited to his style.
Anyway, back to
Duvidha, which I saw today on the NFDC Mani Kaul
3-movie set. In my first viewing on DD, I thought the film was an
interesting ghost story done in a terribly dull manner. Consider the
plot: When a young man leaves his wife on business immediately after
the wedding ceremony for an interval of several years, a yaksha
impersonates him and consorts with the wife (after telling her the
truth). What happens when the young man returns? Who is her real
husband? Very interesting folk tale with a powerful and timeless moral dilemma, like a Girish Karnad play. But dash it if Kaul
doesn't aim to deliberately undermine the dramatic potential with his
confirmed anemic approach. In Kaul's version, the characters are
reduced to ciphers, their ethical dilemmas mere murmurs. It's not
even in the name of realism, I've seen real people immensely more
animated and emotional than the actors in this film. It's in my view
a fake aesthetic designed to appeal to people that believe in the
snob value of such esoteric examples of artistic expression.
That said, my second
viewing was a better experience, mainly because of the better conditions of the viewing. Thanks to the clean-up
job done by NFDC on this release, the mumble-mumble of the soundtrack
is a lot more comprehensible and the sound design can be
appreciated. It doesn't change my impressions of the film a huge deal
but I am less bitter about it now. I suppose the image is better than
what it used to be: It's still very soft and like with the Mirch Masala release, there's a problem with blown whites. You
might find that you need to dial the brightness of your screen a few
notches below usual to make the display easier on your eye and better
appreciate the shadowy compositions.
I'll probably update
this post with more impressions as and when I watch the other films
in the set.
if you don't care to read and learn from what some folks who admire Kaul's work have to say, there is no real need to update your post. I mean, come on, think about it; you've made yr point already.
ReplyDelete